<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Bronto on svrnm :: Severin Neumann</title>
    <link>https://svrnm.com/tags/bronto/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bronto on svrnm :: Severin Neumann</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://svrnm.com/tags/bronto/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Observability is an infinite game, not a war.</title>
      <link>https://svrnm.com/blog/observability-is-an-infinite-game-not-a-war/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://svrnm.com/blog/observability-is-an-infinite-game-not-a-war/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re interested in observability, it is very likely that you read Mat Duggan’s &lt;a href=&#34;https://matduggan.com/clickhouse-is-winning-the-observability-wars/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener noreferrer&#34;&gt;Why Clickhouse is Winning the Observability Wars&lt;/a&gt; or one of the follow ups and responses to it, for example &lt;a href=&#34;https://charity.wtf/p/have-you-heard-clickhouse-is-winning&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener noreferrer&#34;&gt;Charity Majors’&lt;/a&gt;. Both are fantastic articles, and I recommend that you spend the time reading them front to back, give them your attention! And by that I also want to get one thing out of the way, that the title here might suggest: I do not disagree with them, I actually agree wholeheartedly with them on why ClickHouse is the current dominant backend in Observability. And they deserve that spot, as I know first hand from working with their product and knowing some of the great people working on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
